Abbey White, Staff Writer, SatNews
Legacy satellite operators aren’t mourning geostationary orbit. They’re stripping it for parts. The transition is expensive, legally contentious, and, if you look at the earnings, working.
Every autumn, a deciduous tree does something that looks, from the outside, like dying. It forms a thin layer of cells at the base of each leaf stem, seals the wound, reabsorbs the chlorophyll back into its trunk and roots, and lets the leaf fall. Botanists call this abscission — the deliberate severing of what an organism no longer needs, after extracting everything of value. It isn’t decay. The tree is banking resources for spring.
The global satellite communications industry is deep in its own version of this process. From Montreal to Paris to Luxembourg, legacy GEO operators are methodically shedding the high-margin businesses that defined them for decades. They’re executing this shift not because the old models failed overnight, but because the resources those models contain are needed elsewhere. Capital is being pulled out of GEO and reinvested in Low-Earth Orbit constellations and multi-orbit platforms designed for a market that now demands low latency and global reach.
Expensive, legally contentious, and disruptive to a generation of business relationships. It may also be producing a stronger, more diversified industry than the one it’s replacing.
• • •
The Sharpest Edge of the Transition
Telesat Canada embodies both the pain and the logic of industry abscission. The company faces a US$1.7 billion debt maturity wall in December 2026, followed by another $450 million the next year. In January, creditors filed suit alleging that Telesat executed a “fraudulent conveyance” by transferring 62% of its LEO business to an indirect subsidiary, effectively moving the Lightspeed constellation beyond the reach of GEO-linked lenders. Telesat has dismissed the suits as being without merit.
Real lawsuits, real strategic intent. The calculation every legacy operator is now making comes down to a single question: how do you protect future growth from the creditors of the past when both exist inside the same corporate body?
Telesat’s answer has been to wall off Lightspeed and accelerate development. Prime contractor MDA Space is completing a high-volume manufacturing facility in Quebec to double production capacity, with a full launch cadence bringing 156 satellites into operation by the end of 2027. The commercial backlog stands at CAD $1.1 billion, anchored by contracts from Viasat and Orange.
Manik Vinnakota, Telesat’s VP of Customer Experience, framed the company’s position with unusual clarity:
“GEO is not going to continue forever, so let’s cannibalize ourselves by doing what customers need, rather than us being cut out of the market by someone with LEO.”
— Manik Vinnakota, Telesat
You could read that as a concession of defeat. The manufacturing momentum suggests otherwise. The debt situation is undeniably real, but so is the constellation taking shape on the factory floor.
• • •
Where the Lines Crossed
Eutelsat Group’s early-2026 earnings offered the clearest snapshot yet of the industry’s revenue inversion. LEO revenues surged nearly 60% year-over-year; GEO revenues declined 4.5%. For the first time, the growth curve of the new business has visibly overtaken the decline of the old one.
The obvious critique: Eutelsat is spending money it doesn’t have to keep pace with an unreachable competitor. In January, the company signed a contract with Airbus valued at €2.0–2.2 billion for 340 additional LEO satellites. That is a massive capital commitment, particularly as Starlink receives authorization for thousands of additional Gen2 spacecraft.
But the deal structure suggests Eutelsat has built the institutional scaffolding needed to sustain this transition. The satellite order is backed by a €1.5 billion capital increase with support from the French and British governments. These new Airbus-built spacecraft carry advanced digital payloads that can be reconfigured in orbit, acting as a technical bridge toward the EU’s IRIS² (Infrastructure for Resilience, Interconnection and Security by Satellite) sovereign constellation.
Broader context explains why this investment is necessary. Between 2015 and 2023, the cost per megabit collapsed by approximately 80%, leaving GEO utilization at record lows. Brutal figures for operators clinging to the old model. For an operator rotating into LEO — where demand in maritime and aviation is growing faster than capacity — these trends are a tailwind.
• • •
The Multi-Orbit Thesis Takes Shape
Whether LEO would complement or replace GEO is no longer a debate. The answer is both. Companies building hybrid architectures are positioning themselves for a market that neither orbit can serve alone.
Viasat’s trajectory is instructive. The company spent billions building the ViaSat-3 geostationary constellation, featuring three of the most powerful communications satellites ever designed. Not stranded assets, but Viasat has still signed a multi-year contract to integrate Telesat Lightspeed capacity into its in-flight broadband service. Interactive gaming and HD video conferencing at 36,000 kilometers demand latency that GEO physics cannot provide.
CEO Mark Dankberg envisions a future of “shared infrastructure” modeled on terrestrial tower companies. He has argued that there’s no reason for every operator to maintain unique space infrastructure. For a company built on proprietary vertical integration, this is a bold bet on a larger market enabled by standardization.
At industrial scale, the SES-Intelsat merger represents the same logic. This $3.1 billion deal created a combined fleet of 120 satellites with projected savings of €2.4 billion. The merged entity is targeting free cash flow above €1 billion by 2027–2028.
Then-Intelsat CEO David Wajsgras was candid about the drivers of the combination:
“We were facing a situation where we could continue to do what we were doing, but we are not seeing growth. It became natural to start thinking about what companies would be best to consider in a combination.”
— David Wajsgras, then-CEO, Intelsat
Alongside the entity’s financial projections, this sounds less like capitulation and more like disciplined consolidation. Highest-growth segments now account for roughly 60% of combined revenue. SES is also continuing its O3b mPOWER MEO constellation, which provides resilient connectivity for NATO and defense clients.
CEO Adel Al-Saleh acknowledged the limits of legacy assets, stating that current fleets cannot cover all customer requirements. The company is filling those gaps through organic investment and partnerships (even with SpaceX). Multi-orbit isn’t a slogan anymore. It’s the core operating model.
• • •
Repricing Orbital Risk
Rising orbital access costs are already separating sustainable operators from the rest. A joint analysis by the Space Futures Centre and the World Economic Forum estimates that failing to manage space debris could cost the global economy over $25 billion in the next decade. These costs are already appearing through service disruptions and increased fuel consumption during avoidance maneuvers.
Insurance markets are repricing to reflect these risks. In congested LEO regions, premiums now account for up to 10% of a mission’s budget. Insurers are shifting toward parametric policies triggered by verified orbital anomalies. An emerging “sustainability premium” rewards operators with clean track records and active collision-avoidance systems with better terms.
How Coverage Is Changing
| Feature | Traditional Policy | 2026 Sustainable Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Premium Basis | Historical failure rates | Real-time orbital safety scoring |
| Collision Deductible | 10–20% of asset value | Waived with Space Situational Awareness (SSA) data sharing |
| Coverage Limit | Capped per satellite | Fleet-wide aggregate |
| Fault Requirement | Complex, often unproven | No-fault parametric payout |
Repricing orbital access creates a structural advantage for established operators with mature safety programs. Even Starlink has lowered thousands of satellites to avoid congestion, signaling that the dominant player recognizes debris management as an operational necessity. For legacy operators, decades of management experience may turn the sustainability premium into a competitive moat.
• • •
Waiting for Spring
Industry abscission isn’t complete. Litigation will continue; the SES-Intelsat integration faces the hard work of harmonizing ground infrastructure. SpaceX remains a competitor with unit economics that no traditional operator can match head-to-head.
Boardroom decisions to go multi-orbit are, in a sense, the easy part. Harder: engineering handovers between GEO, MEO, and LEO for an airline passenger mid-flight or a naval vessel switching beams in contested waters. Ground segment integration — the antenna networks, beam routing software, and latency management across orbits with fundamentally different physics — is where these strategies will succeed or fail. None of the major operators have demonstrated this at commercial scale. These are operational milestones still to be achieved, and the industry’s credibility rests on hitting them.
The central question was never about outrunning Starlink on price. It was whether legacy operators could transform into something the market still needs. Eutelsat’s revenue growth proves the replacement business can scale; Viasat’s hybrid architecture proves the orbits are complementary.
Sovereignty plays a role too. Government backing for Eutelsat and Telesat signals that satellite connectivity is now treated as critical national infrastructure. In an industry with compressed margins, government anchor tenancy may be as vital as consumer growth.
By 2027, the concept of a “GEO company” will be obsolete. There will only be multi-orbit operators that successfully reinvested their resources into hybrid architectures. The canopy is falling, but the roots are deep. The satellite industry is sacrificing what it was to become what the environment now demands. Painful, but spring is arriving on a launch manifest.
Abbey White is a staff writer at SatNews covering satellite communications, operator strategy, and industry consolidation.
