…by European nations risk reducing the continent’s defense and security to “hot air,” turning the alliance into what he called a “global spectator” rather than a real force on the world stage.
NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen addresses the European Parliament’s Committee on Foreign Affairs.
“Having the right capabilities is important, but it is not enough,” he said. “We must also have the political will to use them, to deal with security challenges on Europe’s doorstep, to help manage crises further away that might affect us here at home, and to better share the security burden with our North American allies.”
Meanwhile, he said, European nations need to make better use of what they have “to do more together as Europeans within the European Union and within NATO—to deliver the critical defense capabilities that are too expensive for any individual country to deliver alone.”
It was the latest in a series of warnings over the past several years by Rasmussen that further cuts by European governments in defense spending could put NATO’s viability at risk. In 2011, Rasmussen said the trend suggested the continent was headed toward getting out of the security business entirely, pointing out that European nations had cut their defense budgets by $45 billion—the equivalent of Germany’s entire annual defense budget—while U.S contributions to NATO had increased from about half of total alliance spending to close to 75 percent.
Those comments were followed by a blunt warning from then-U.S. Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates, who said NATO risked “irrelevance” and a “dismal future” if alliance members were not seen as “serious and capable partners in their own defense.”
Rasmussen added that soft power alone really is no power at all. “Without hard capabilities to back up its diplomacy, Europe will lack credibility and influence,” he added. “It will risk being a global spectator, rather than the powerful global actor that it can be and should be.”
