SciGuy, A science blog with Eric Berger from Chron.com of the Houston Chronicle, April 23, 2009
I’m at Johnson Space Center this morning for what should be a day of celebration for the space agency. This morning mission managers will discuss the STS-125 mission’s plan to fix the Hubble Space Telescope, and this afternoon the crew will meet the media.
However, there’s a definite undercurrent of unease. President Barack Obama has yet to name a new administrator to replace Mike Griffin, nor has he clearly elaborated his vision for the space agency’s future.
That has left current employees and contractors to press ahead with their current plans to end shuttle flights in 2010, and the Constellation program to resume flying astronauts into space by 2015.
Yet the apparent indecision from Obama, which if nothing else suggests to NASA employees that they rate lower on the President’s priorities than choosing a dog, is now causing some significant programmatic problems.
A recent memo from shuttle program manager John Shannon to shuttle managers and engineers, obtained by CBS News, indicated that if NASA is to stick to its plan to retire the shuttle next year it will need to begin shutting down critical components by this month’s end.
NASA: The Ares V vehicle faces at least a two-year delay.
In other words, managers need to be making the “hard decisions” now, and to do that they need clear guidance that there will be just nine more flights and the shuttle program really must end in 2010. The lack of a new administrator precludes such clarity.
Then there are the swirling concerns about delays to the Constellation program, nicely outlined in this Orlando Sentinel story. Because of funding shortfalls NASA may have to delay its program to return to the moon by two years, and there’s also concern about making the 2015 launch date to resume flying astronauts to the space station.
This would make a gap that’s already five years even worse and further increase NASA’s reliance on Russian launches.
We’re at the point where the delay in naming a new administrator has moved beyond being a political curiosity into the realm of where it could be doing real and permanent harm to NASA.
And so while today is a day everyone at Johnson Space Center will celebrate, and everyone’s looking forward to the launch of STS-125 next month, most space buffs here in Clear Lake probably have an uneasy feeling in their stomachs.
UPDATE: Here are some comments made this morning by deputy space shuttle program manager LeRoy Cain on the effects of uncertainty on the space shuttle:
We’re at a pivotal point. … As we move forward in time it becomes more difficult from a funding standpoint because what we’re doing is shaping the workforce and shaping the content of work for a completion of the shuttle mission in Sept. 2010. As we get closer and closer to the end it becomes more and more difficult, it requires more and more money to turn that around.
Since last Fall we have been asked through legislation to maintain the ability to continue and extend the shuttle through “Do Not Preclude” language through April of this year. We are coming to the end of that timeline.
In other words, April 30 looms as a very significant date.
