The new system, called the Mini-Helicon Plasma Thruster, is much smaller than other rockets of its kind and runs on gases that are much less expensive than conventional propellants. As a result, it could slash fuel consumption by 10 times that of conventional systems used for the same applications, says Oleg Batishchev, a principal research scientist in the Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics and leader of the work. The current propulsion systems — used for maintaining a satellite’s orbit, pushing a spacecraft from one orbit to another, and otherwise maneuvering in space — rely on chemical reactions that occur within the fuel, releasing energy that ultimately propels the object. Although such systems have brought humans to the moon and are regularly used in a variety of other applications, they have limitations. For example, chemical rockets are expensive largely due to the amount of fuel they use.
As a result, engineers have been developing alternative, non-chemical rockets. In these, an external source of electrical energy is used to accelerate the propellant that provides the thrust for moving a craft through space. Such non-chemical rockets have been successfully used by NASA and the European Space Agency in missions including NASA’s Deep Space 1, which involved the flyby of a comet and asteroid.
But the field is still relatively new, and these advanced rockets are one focus of the MIT Space Propulsion Laboratory (SPL).The Mini-Helicon is the first rocket to run on nitrogen, the most abundant gas in our atmosphere. The Mini-Helicon has three general parts: a quartz tube wrapped by a coiled antenna, with magnets surrounding both. The gas of interest is pumped into the quartz tube, where radio frequency power transmitted to the gas from the antenna turns the gas into plasma, or electrically charged gas. The magnets not only help produce the plasma, but also confine, guide and accelerate it through the system. “The plasma beam exhausted from the tube is what gives us the thrust to propel the rocket,” Batishchev says. He noted that the exhaust velocity from the new rocket is some 10 times higher than the velocity from the average chemical rocket, so much less propellant is needed.
